Rebel:
Uhm... I guess you didn't realize, my "translations" were done to try to clarify the physical realities and where we actually are with your statements I felt important. It wasn't meant to be deragatory, and the EDIT3 content was directed towards the General who had indicated such things, as it says in the first sentence. The rest of the EDITs were more general info I thought people might find interesting. I certainly found it to be, and some of people of my previous association thought it was.
Perhaps in the future we can avoid these things, although I think your pride has blinded you a little too much in this instance. It's not like I was truly even contesting you on anything, as the fact you yourself recognized as not being your argument should have helped you to realize. Correcting perhaps, but not going after you. There was little point then, or now for that matter.
So if I may be so bold, what would you have me do, that you believe think may have avoided this unfortunate misunderstanding? What wasn't clear enough, or not neutral enough in your opinion? I personally try to keep these things in as neutral, and simply factual a voice as possible, while keeping it interesting.
Uhm... I guess you didn't realize, my "translations" were done to try to clarify the physical realities and where we actually are with your statements I felt important. It wasn't meant to be deragatory, and the EDIT3 content was directed towards the General who had indicated such things, as it says in the first sentence. The rest of the EDITs were more general info I thought people might find interesting. I certainly found it to be, and some of people of my previous association thought it was.
Perhaps in the future we can avoid these things, although I think your pride has blinded you a little too much in this instance. It's not like I was truly even contesting you on anything, as the fact you yourself recognized as not being your argument should have helped you to realize. Correcting perhaps, but not going after you. There was little point then, or now for that matter.
So if I may be so bold, what would you have me do, that you believe think may have avoided this unfortunate misunderstanding? What wasn't clear enough, or not neutral enough in your opinion? I personally try to keep these things in as neutral, and simply factual a voice as possible, while keeping it interesting.